🔬
The deScier Whitepaper
SummaryIntroductionTechnology Key FeaturesGovernanceRoadmap
  • Descier Whitepaper V1.0
    • Descier Whitepaper V1.0
    • 🟣Summary
    • 🥽The Purpose of This Whitepaper
  • Luminary
    • 🛰️Introduction
    • 🗺️The deScier Vision
      • Background and Need for a New Model
      • Publishing
        • Exploitative Practices in the Publishing Industry
      • Limited Access to Scientific Knowledge
      • Challenges in Maintaining Research Integrity
      • Inadequate Recognition and Incentives for Researchers
    • 👩‍🔬Principles and values
      • The deScier Ecosystem
      • The Path to a Decentralized Future for Science
      • The deScier Community: A Network of Scientists
        • Building the deScier Community
          • Steps to Join the deScier Network
          • Benefits and Opportunities for Members
          • Outreach and Partnerships
  • Synergy
    • 💻Technology Stack
      • Platform Overview and Features
      • Collaboration Tools and Peer Review Process
      • Open Access and Data Sharing
      • Intellectual Property and Licensing
    • 🧬Key Features and Functionalities
      • The deScier Scientific Publication Initiative
        • Managing scientific paper data assets as NFTs
        • The DeSci Journal - First issue
      • Collaboration Tools and Peer Review Process
        • Open Access and Data Sharing
        • Intellectual Property and Licensing
        • Community-Driven Governance Model
      • Funding and Grants for Scientific Research
  • Horizon
    • ⚗️Governance and Sustainability
      • Governance Framework Overview
      • Community-Driven Governance Model
        • Proposal Process
      • Financial Sustainability and Funding Mechanisms
        • The $deSci pretoken and token economy
          • Community Genesis Auction
          • Staking and Signaling
      • Ethics and Research Integrity
    • 🚀Roadmap
      • Expected Outcomes and Benefits for Science
      • Measuring Success: Metrics and Evaluation
      • Long-term Vision and Future Developments
  • Conclusion
  • Appendices
    • Case Studies of Successful deScier Projects
    • Profiles of Key deScier Community Members
    • Resources and Additional Information
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • A fair scientific publishing system will be revolutionary
  • Copyright in the traditional scientific publishing industry
  • The impact factor
  • The increasing number of scientific publishing houses and journals and the predatory behavior

Was this helpful?

  1. Luminary
  2. Principles and values

The deScier Ecosystem

PreviousPrinciples and valuesNextThe Path to a Decentralized Future for Science

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

A fair scientific publishing system will be revolutionary

Access to scientific knowledge is key for human development.

Research and development (R&D) go hand in hand. There is a positive correlation to those countries spending high on R&D and their gross domestic . Increased investment in R&D can contribute to technological advancements, innovation, and economic growth, which can in turn further enhance a country's GDP.

Scientific articles also simply called “papers” are pieces of detailed information on a certain area.

Papers give access to other people’s experience and expertise in a very granular way.

When a scientist has an idea, the first step is to carry an extensive bibliographical search on all papers published on that certain subject. Often, you find from there a thread to be followed in that line of research.

Copyright in the traditional scientific publishing industry

It is all around the ownership of ideas put in written. But not all ideas, a certain kind of ideas pertaining exclusively to the exploration of science and the scientific method.

Scientists pay for publishing, pay for open access and universities and research institutions subscribe their libraries so that staff and alumni can have access to knowledge.

The impact factor

The so-called impact factor is a number created by the publishing houses for the publishing houses. Impact factor is calculated by the number of citations (REF) and has been intrinsically linked to the quality of a given scientific journal. The highest the impact factor the ‘best’ the journal.

Other factors were created on top of the impact factor. Take for example, the Qualis system created by the Brazilian Research Council’s.

We, in Academia, are happy to comply with this narrative. The impact factor narrative was bought not only by scientists, but head of laboratories, directors, presidents and even, funding agencies which abide to cite this factor as a filter element for their hiring and funding choices.

Impact factor is a completely biased element, completely interest-focused on selling more and more expensive space on ‘top’ journals.

But money is not enough.

Hidden under high rejection rates and outrageous publications fees, in the name of scientific quality many of these ‘top journals’ work as exclusive clubs or associations. In these closed circles admittance is via the right connection, belonging to the right university or lab or, under the supervision of the right advisor or mentor.

Nothing of this has to do with scientific quality.

Impact factor is a business model created to sell prestige.

The increasing number of scientific publishing houses and journals and the predatory behavior

It has been estimated that there are 50 thousand titles on scientific journals.

Even traditional journals which have been around for more than a century multiplied their titles to serve an ever-increasing multitude of scientific areas. Some journals are overwhelmingly specific (give example such as The Knee Journal-if exists).

👩‍🔬
product-GDP